Shell heralds adventurous co-engineering as the key to improving vehicle energy efficiency
Mar 10, 2011
Goh Swee Chen, Shell’s vice president for bulk fuels and lubricants in Asia, calls for greater technology partnership and collaboration at the 17th Annual Fuels and Lubricants Conference.
Shell today said that innovation, adventurous thinking and long-term partnerships between automotive original engine manufacturers (OEMs) and fuels and lubricants manufacturers will be fundamental to improving vehicle energy efficiency. Goh Swee Chen, Shell’s vice president for bulk fuels and lubricants in Asia, outlined the importance of co-engineering to push the frontiers of energy efficiency. She was addressing industry experts at the 17th Annual Fuels and Lubricants Conference in Singapore, which centred around the theme “Technology & Innovation: Creating More with Less”.
Against the backdrop of increased global demand for energy, and with two thirds of vehicles still expected to use current engine technologies and conventional liquid fuels by 2050, Swee Chen said: “We need to use innovation and partnerships to find ways of improving fuel economy and engine cleanliness by improving and applying existing technologies.” She also highlighted the critical role of lubricants in improving the efficiency of the engine and driveline.
Shell currently works with a number of leading OEMs, including Daimler. Daimler’s most economical truck, the new Mercedes-Benz Actros, set a new world record for the most fuel-efficient 40-tonne truck when powered by Shell FuelSave Diesel and Shell Rimula R6 LME, a Shell lubricant. Shell also worked with Gordon Murray Design, a company with a background in motor sport, to develop a radical new type of lightweight urban passenger vehicle to help meet the CO2 challenge.
This led to the development of an innovative concept engine lubricant capable of achieving a 6.5 per cent ¹ improvement in fuel efficiency, a step-change compared to improvements of around 2.5 per cent achieved in typical fuel economy lubricant development programmes.
While these partnerships have broken new ground, Swee Chen called upon the industry to commit to greater collaboration: “Further savings can be achieved when the lubricants provider and the automotive OEM work together to develop bespoke products for a particular vehicle. Those developments are clearly important, but to move those efficiency gains onto the next level, the industry will need to move to the next level of collaboration. This means long-term co-engineering projects where we develop fuels, lubricants and vehicles together.”
To unlock this future potential, Swee Chen argued that the solution lies in focusing on customer preferences and needs, as well as pushing the boundaries of innovation: “Fuels and lubricants providers and OEMs will all need to consider more adventurous approaches. In particular, I believe we should be considering new approaches to specifying oils, and to tackling issues of backward compatibility.”
Swee Chen concluded by warning that no one company or part of the industry will succeed by acting alone: “We can see that significant progress can be made through partnerships focused on improving the technologies that we already have in place for conventional fuels and vehicles. But that will not be enough.
We will also need larger scale collaboration across OEMs and the whole range of energy providers to develop the technologies, the rules, the practical applications needed to meet the challenges of the future. And we, at Shell, certainly want to remain at the heart of this debate and strengthen our partnerships with OEMs further to move our collaboration and co-engineering onto the next level.”
¹ The figure of 6.5 per cent is derived from testing on an urban cycle (the urban cycle is designed to mimic the conditions of city driving). Combined cycle (the combined cycle is designed to mimic both urban and motorway driving) testing yielded a 4.6 per cent benefit. The testing undertaken compares the concept lubricant to a 10W-30 oil, which is a widely-used viscosity in European markets.
|Ms Rachel Ringstead||+44 20 3047 4051||Rachel.Ringstead@edelman.com|
|Mr Yam-Chew Oh||+44 20 7934 2253||Yam-Chew.Oh@shell.com|
About Shell Lubricants
The term “Shell Lubricants” collectively refers to Shell Group companies engaged in the lubricants business. They manufacture and blend products for use in a range of applications, from consumer motoring to mining and power generation to commercial transport. Shell’s portfolio of lubricant brands includes Pennzoil®, Quaker State®, Shell Rotella T, Shell Helix, Shell Rimula, Shell Tellus, Monarch and Jiffy Lube®. Shell has leading lubricants research centres in Germany, Japan (joint venture with Showa Shell), UK, and the USA.
We focus on developing products and services that provide both superior protection and efficiency. Our products are manufactured and marketed in more countries than any other lubricant supplier’s, enabling us to supply to our largest customers. We are expanding rapidly into emerging markets while continuing to seek growth in our heartland markets.
In 2002, Shell acquired Pennzoil-Quaker State Company to become the No. 1 lubricants marketer in the USA. Pennzoil motor oil has been one of the leading motor oil brands in the USA since 1985.
In 2006, Shell acquired a 75% share in Tongyi, China’s leading independent lubricant manufacturer. Today, Shell is the leading international lubricants supplier in China and has the third-largest share of China’s rapidly growing market.
In November 2009, we opened our sixth lube oil blending plant in Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, China. With a production capacity of 200 million litres a year and the potential for a phased development to 400 million litres a year, the complex could become one of Shell’s top three lubricant blending plants worldwide in volume terms.
In 2010, Shell was named the No. 1 global lubricants supplier for the fourth consecutive year, selling more lubricants in 2009 than any other company in the world. (Source: Kline & Company)
The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly and indirectly owns investments are separate entities. In this press release “Shell”, “Shell group” and “Royal Dutch Shell” are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general.
Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also used to refer to subsidiaries in general or to those who work for them. These expressions are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular company or companies. ‘‘Subsidiaries’’, “Shell subsidiaries” and “Shell companies” as used in this press release refer to companies in which Royal Dutch Shell either directly or indirectly has control, by having either a majority of the voting rights or the right to exercise a controlling influence.
The companies in which Shell has significant influence but not control are referred to as “associated companies” or “associates” and companies in which Shell has joint control are referred to as “jointly controlled entities”.
In this press release, associates and jointly controlled entities are also referred to as “equity-accounted investments”. The term “Shell interest” is used for convenience to indicate the direct and/or indirect (for example, through our 24% shareholding in Woodside Petroleum Ltd.) ownership interest held by Shell in a venture, partnership or company, after exclusion of all third-party interest.
This press release contains forward-looking statements concerning the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of Royal Dutch Shell. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements.
Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Royal Dutch Shell to market risks and statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions.
These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as ‘‘anticipate’’, ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘estimate’’, ‘‘expect’’, ‘‘intend’’, ‘‘may’’, ‘‘plan’’, ‘‘objectives’’, ‘‘outlook’’, ‘‘probably’’, ‘‘project’’, ‘‘will’’, ‘‘seek’’, ‘‘target’’, ‘‘risks’’, ‘‘goals’’, ‘‘should’’ and similar terms and phrases.
There are a number of factors that could affect the future operations of Royal Dutch Shell and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this press release, including (without limitation):
(a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; (b) changes in demand for the Shell’s products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production results; (e) reserve estimates; (f) loss of market share and industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks; (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and countries subject to international sanctions;
(j) legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments including regulatory measures addressing climate change; (k) economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared costs; and (m) changes in trading conditions.
All forward-looking statements contained in this press release are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
Additional factors that may affect future results are contained in Royal Dutch Shell’s 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 (available at www.shell.com/investor and www.sec.gov). These factors also should be considered by the reader.
Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this press release, March 10, 2011. Neither Royal Dutch Shell nor any of its subsidiaries undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or other information.
In light of these risks, results could differ materially from those stated, implied or inferred from the forward-looking statements contained in this press release.
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) permits oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proved reserves that a company has demonstrated by actual production or conclusive formation tests to be economically and legally producible under existing economic and operating conditions.
We may have used certain terms in this press release that SEC's guidelines strictly prohibit us from including in filings with the SEC. U.S. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 20-F, File No 1-32575, available on the SEC website www.sec.gov. You can also obtain these forms from the SEC by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.