Blockchain

A blockchain is a decentralised, immutable ledger. It can be used to record transactions involving digital assets without a central authority. Each transaction is organised to form a block. Each block references the previous block to create a “chain”. Participants in the system verify the transactions in a block before it is added to the chain in a way that creates consensus such that participants can agree on the authenticity of the transaction. This is how a blockchain provides a decentralized protocol to control digital assets.

Blockchains add a verification layer to the internet that allows people, devices and algorithms to transact with each other directly. The trading, verification and governance of data is managed today through Trusted Third Parties which are not necessary in a blockchain-based network.

Blockchains are a significant next step in the digitalisation of business, government and society. In the digitalisation of the energy industry, blockchain will not only enable automation but will create digital autonomous systems. Blockchain will enable a further reduction in intermediaries in value chains.

Blockchains solve a very fundamental problem in computer science: the double-spend problem. This means that any digital asset can be duplicated and spent infinitely. But it is not a computer science problem alone, it is a very realistic problem for transactions involving online data.

The essence of that problem is that there is no such thing as digital continuity: the unbroken and consistent existence of a digital object over time. Or in plain English: How can you prove that a digital asset is real? This is now solved by using intermediaries taking on the role of Trusted Third Parties and (manual) reconciliation of data between disparate databases and systems.

On a blockchain, we create a unique ID of a digital asset and record any and all state changes to that digital asset. This makes the digital asset real, because we can verify that it exists from inception until the present. And we do not need any intermediary to guarantee the existence or authenticity of the digital asset. We also do not need reconciliation if we move the digital asset between parties, because there is only asset with one reality. Nothing is lost in translation because there are no translations!

This can significantly reduce transaction costs associated with the exchange of assets and information. It enables a single source of “truth” and transparency and traceability to all transactions and records without the need for a central owner or database. Also, because it is cryptographically secure and distributed, it is less susceptible to data breaches compared to today’s current model of large databases and information maintained by a central entity or intermediary.

The impact of blockchain on processes is straightforward: less intermediaries and less need for reconciliation which means lower costs, more real-time and increased efficiency. Processes will become more digital as the need for manual reconciliation between databases will be removed. This is not only true for digital assets, but also analogue assets with corresponding data obtained through sensors. The real asset and its digital representative can become one. This is valuable in, for example, logistics or provenance.

An example of a blockchain project underway in this space within Shell is the Digital Passport system for equipment. We have initiated a pilot project to create a decentralized digital passport system for the authentication of equipment, parts and products. Blockchain technology makes it possible to create a digital passport for a piece of equipment by providing a system that enables data to be disclosed between certain parties in a supply chain. In turn, this enables us to enhance tracking and management of safety-critical process equipment or products throughout their life cycles.

Many Shell processes rely heavily on paperwork for records and transactions relating to procurement, inspection, certification and tracking of hardware and materials. This paper-based approach results in higher costs and longer delivery times. The decentralised digital passport provides a record of all the relevant events and checks in the life cycle of each piece of equipment. These details can be verified by everyone in the supply chain. They present a single source of truth and are selectively visible to relevant parties. Encryption enables secure data sharing and shielding of sensitive data. In this pilot, Shell is working with industry partners such as manufacturers, inspectors and contractor companies to redefine the way it collaborates in its supply chains. These technologies are expected to reduce costs, increase productivity and ensure safer operations for every party within the ecosystem.

The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly and indirectly owns investments are separate legal entities. In this content “Shell”, “Shell Group” and “Royal Dutch Shell” are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general. Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also used to refer to Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general or to those who work for them. These terms are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular entity or entities. ‘‘Subsidiaries’’, “Shell subsidiaries” and “Shell companies” as used in this content refer to entities over which Royal Dutch Shell plc either directly or indirectly has control. Entities and unincorporated arrangements over which Shell has joint control are generally referred to as “joint ventures” and “joint operations”, respectively. Entities over which Shell has significant influence but neither control nor joint control are referred to as “associates”. The term “Shell interest” is used for convenience to indicate the direct and/or indirect ownership interest held by Shell in an entity or unincorporated joint arrangement, after exclusion of all third-party interest.

This content contains data and analysis from Shell’s Sky scenario. Unlike Shell’s previously published Mountains and Oceans exploratory scenarios, the Sky scenario is based on the assumption that society reaches the Paris Agreement’s goal of holding the rise in global average temperatures this century to well below two degrees Celsius (2°C) above pre-industrial levels. Unlike Shell’s Mountains and Oceans scenarios, which unfolded in an open-ended way based upon plausible assumptions and quantifications, the Sky scenario was specifically designed to reach the Paris Agreement’s goal in a technically possible manner. These scenarios are a part of an ongoing process used in Shell for over 40 years to challenge executives’ perspectives on the future business environment. They are designed to stretch management to consider even events that may only be remotely possible. Scenarios, therefore, are not intended to be predictions of likely future events or outcomes.

Additionally, it is important to note that as of April 16, 2020, Shell’s operating plans and budgets do not reflect Shell’s Net-Zero Emissions ambition. Shell’s aim is that, in the future, its operating plans and budgets will change to reflect this movement towards its new Net-Zero Emissions ambition. However, these plans and budgets need to be in step with the movement towards a Net-Zero Emissions economy within society and among Shell’s customers.

Also, in this content we may refer to Shell’s “Net Carbon Footprint”, which includes Shell’s carbon emissions from the production of our energy products, our suppliers’ carbon emissions in supplying energy for that production and our customers’ carbon emissions associated with their use of the energy products we sell. Shell only controls its own emissions. The use of the term Shell’s “Net Carbon Footprint” is for convenience only and not intended to suggest these emissions are those of Shell or its subsidiaries.

This content contains forward-looking statements (within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) concerning the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of Royal Dutch Shell. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Royal Dutch Shell to market risks and statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as “aim”, “ambition”, ‘‘anticipate’’, ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘estimate’’, ‘‘expect’’, ‘‘goals’’, ‘‘intend’’, ‘‘may’’, ‘‘objectives’’, ‘‘outlook’’, ‘‘plan’’, ‘‘probably’’, ‘‘project’’, ‘‘risks’’, “schedule”, ‘‘seek’’, ‘‘should’’, ‘‘target’’, ‘‘will’’ and similar terms and phrases. There are a number of factors that could affect the future operations of Royal Dutch Shell and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this content, including (without limitation): (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; (b) changes in demand for Shell’s products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production results; (e) reserves estimates; (f) loss of market share and industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks; (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and countries subject to international sanctions; (j) legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments including regulatory measures addressing climate change; (k) economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared costs; (m) risks associated with the impact of pandemics, such as the COVID-19 (coronavirus) outbreak; and (n) changes in trading conditions. No assurance is provided that future dividend payments will match or exceed previous dividend payments. All forward-looking statements contained in this content are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Additional risk factors that may affect future results are contained in Royal Dutch Shell’s Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2019 (available at www.shell.com/investor and www.sec.gov). These risk factors also expressly qualify all forward-looking statements contained in this content and should be considered by the reader. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this content, January 13, 2021. Neither Royal Dutch Shell plc nor any of its subsidiaries undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or other information. In light of these risks, results could differ materially from those stated, implied or inferred from the forward-looking statements contained in this content.

We may have used certain terms, such as resources, in this content that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) strictly prohibits us from including in our filings with the SEC. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 20-F, File No 1-32575, available on the SEC website www.sec.gov.