High Sulphur Fuel Oil
Next to various grades of RMG and RME, Shell is offering RMK 500 and RMK 700. This provides our customers with a lower fuel cost, without compromising on quality!
What’s different with the RMK’s and the RMG 380?
RMK 500 & 700 fuels are made from the same basic components as lower viscosity fuels, with cutters (such as cycle oils, gas oil, etc) being used in varying proportions to achieve the required viscosity and density of the fuel grade. Optimising the fuel blend in this way has no significant impact on fuel performance for those vessels that are equipped to consume it, but has one major advantage: it is cheaper to produce and therefore a more cost-effective energy source for the vessel operator.
The benefits of Shell RMK’s:
In the 60 years since Shell pioneered the use of residual fuels for diesel engines in its fleet, the shipping industry has benefited from the use of this cost-effective energy source. Developments in fuel treatment and engine technology have enabled the industry to progressively make use of more cost-competitive grades, with typical fuel viscosities increasing from 180cSt to 380cSt, and to 500 and 700cSt.
High-density 500/700cSt fuel oil is a well established and proven marine bunker fuel, suitable for use in large modern vessels with low-speed diesel engines. It is more cost competitive than 380cSt fuel, and therefore offers operators comparable performance at lower cost.
What are the operational considerations for the use of Shell RMK’s ?
Compared with conventional RMG 380 fuel, RMK 500/700 has both a higher viscosity and a higher density, but this has no practical impact. Alcap type centrifugal separators used for fuel cleaning can deal with fuel densities of up to 1010 kg/m3 @ 15°C. The higher fuel viscosity requires a slightly higher storage and handling temperature (typically 4-6°C).
Vessels burning RMK 500/700 needs sufficient heating capacity to maintain these slightly elevated temperatures, but the heat required can usually be provided by the waste heat boiler of the vessel, and most of the heat put into the fuel is recovered in the engine.
Why Shell RMK 500/700?
Shell has been supplying high density, high viscosity fuels into the marine market for over 20 years, in which time we have supplied tens of millions of tons of Shell’s RMK 500/700 to our customers. Over that time we have built up vast experience in the production, blending and handling of these fuels, and of their satisfactory performance in our customers’ vessels.
Shell’s RMK 500/700 is tightly controlled through our Fuel Oil Quality Assurance System (FOQAS), to ensure compliance with Shell’s global standards (which
include several internal specifications that are more stringent than the full ISO 8217 (2010) specification). These standards are rigorously applied to assure customers of the high degree of confidence they require that the fuels they buy will be on specification and will burn efficiently in their engine.
Shell RMK 500/700 complies with the ISO 8217 (2010) specification for RMK 380 in every respect with the exception, obviously, of viscosity.
Shell RMK 500/700 Combustion Properties
Whilst the composition of Shell RMK 500/700 is very similar to that of other fuels such as RMG 380, it is critical that suppliers selling higher viscosity fuels understand the impact that changes in fuel formulation can have on the performance of the fuel. Meeting the bulk properties set out in the ISO spec is not always sufficient to ensure good performance in the engine.
This is why Shell continues to compliment our long experience of how to blend good quality fuels with an ongoing Marine Fuels Research and Development Program, in our Group research laboratories in Amsterdam and our dedicated Marine research facility in Hamburg. This includes extensive monitoring of the ignition and combustion properties of our fuels in our test engines and Fuel Ignition Analysis (FIA) equipment.
No greater risks to stability and compatibility
When mixing residual fuels of different qualities or from different sources there is the potential for stability and compatibility issues to arise, as a lower aromatic content may increase the risk of asphaltene precipitation leading to sludge formation. However, as a result of the high aromaticity of Shell RMK 500 there is no increased stability or compatibility risk when mixing Shell RMK 500 and RMG 380.
Are you taking full advantage of this cost effective quality fuel oil?
| Concerns | Operational Impact | How to manage |
|---|---|---|
| Composition: | No impact, the composition of shell MFO 500 is similar to that of ISO standard RMG 380 | - |
| Higher density: | No impact if onboard fuel treatment plant is equipped to manage density greater than water | Commonly installed Alcap type centrifuge can accommodate fuel density up to 1010 kg/m3 @ 15°C. |
| Higher Viscosity: | Requires slightly higher [4-6°C] bunker tank and fuel injection temperatures | Heat usually available onboard from waste heat boiler |
| Stability and Compatibility: | No increased risk when mixing shell MFO 500 and RMG 380 | Shell Spot Test Kit can be used to identify non-compatibility of different fuels if required |
| Wider scope for use of unsuitable blend components: | Would potenially lead to poor combustion; HSE issues | Shell FOQAS quality assurance system strictly controls the components used in the manufacture of shell fuels |
| Ignition and Combustion: | Low Speed Engine: normally no issue provided combustion properties of the fuel are suitable for use in a marine engine Medium Speed Engines: normally no issues in engines <10 years old | Shell has >20 years of experience supplying tens of millions of tons of this fuel, and an ongoing R&D program evaluation combustion properties Consult with a Shell Marine technical advisor to evaluate suitability for your operations. |
Disclaimer
Disclaimer
Cautionary Note
The companies in which Shell plc directly and indirectly owns investments are separate legal entities. In this content “Shell”, “Shell Group” and “Group” are sometimes used for convenience to reference Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general. Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also used to refer to Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general or to those who work for them. These terms are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular entity or entities. ‘‘Subsidiaries’’, “Shell subsidiaries” and “Shell companies” as used in this content refer to entities over which Shell plc either directly or indirectly has control. The terms “joint venture”, “joint operations”, “joint arrangements”, and “associates” may also be used to refer to a commercial arrangement in which Shell has a direct or indirect ownership interest with one or more parties. The term “Shell interest” is used for convenience to indicate the direct and/or indirect ownership interest held by Shell in an entity or unincorporated joint arrangement, after exclusion of all third-party interest.
Forward-Looking statements
This content contains forward-looking statements (within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) concerning the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of Shell. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions, including (without limitation) those concerning Shell’s strategy and operating plans, macroeconomic conditions, future energy demand, supply and product mix, commodity prices, demand for Shell’s products, production results and reserve estimates, development, execution and management of projects, energy transition and climate change, management of safety and environmental risks, costs, cash capital expenditures, technology advancements, legislative, judicial, fiscal and regulatory developments, regional conflicts and trading conditions, and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Shell to market risks and statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as “aim”; “ambition”; ‘‘anticipate’’; “aspire”, “aspiration”, ‘‘believe’’; “commit”; “commitment”; ‘‘could’’; “desire”; ‘‘estimate’’; ‘‘expect’’; ‘‘goals’’; ‘‘intend’’; ‘‘may’’; “milestones”; ‘‘objectives’’; ‘‘outlook’’; ‘‘plan’’; ‘‘probably’’; ‘‘project’’; ‘‘risks’’; “schedule”; ‘‘seek’’; ‘‘should’’; ‘‘target’’; “vision”; ‘‘will’’; “would” and similar terms and phrases. There are a number of factors that could affect the future operations of Shell and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this content, including (without limitation): (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; (b) changes in demand for Shell’s products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production results; (e) reserves estimates; (f) loss of market share and industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks, including climate change; (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and countries subject to international sanctions; (j) legislative, judicial, fiscal and regulatory developments including tariffs and regulatory measures addressing climate change; (k) economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared costs; (m) risks associated with the impact of pandemics, regional conflicts, such as the Russia-Ukraine war and the conflict in the Middle East, and a significant cyber security, data privacy or IT incident; (n) the pace of the energy transition; and (o) changes in trading conditions. No assurance is provided that future dividend payments will match or exceed previous dividend payments. All forward-looking statements contained in this content are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Additional risk factors that may affect future results are contained in Shell plc’s Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2025 (available at www.shell.com/investors/news-and-filings/sec-filings.html and www.sec.gov). These risk factors also expressly qualify all forward-looking statements contained in this content and should be considered by the reader. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the publication mentioned in this website. Neither Shell plc nor any of its subsidiaries undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or other information. In light of these risks, results could differ materially from those stated, implied or inferred from the forward-looking statements contained in this content.
Shell’s net carbon intensity and net-zero emissions target
In this content we may refer to Shell’s “net carbon intensity” (NCI), which includes Shell’s carbon emissions from the production of our energy products, our suppliers’ carbon emissions in supplying energy for that production and our customers’ carbon emissions associated with their use of the energy products we sell. Shell’s NCI also includes the emissions associated with the production and use of energy products produced by others which Shell purchases for resale. Shell only controls its own emissions. The use of the terms Shell’s “net carbon intensity” or NCI is for convenience only and not intended to suggest these emissions are those of Shell plc or its subsidiaries.
Shell’s operating plan and outlook are forecasted for a three-year period and ten-year period, respectively, and are updated every year. They reflect the current economic environment and what we can reasonably expect to see over the next three and ten years. Accordingly, the outlook reflects our combined Scope 1 and 2 target, NCI target and our oil products ambition over the next ten years. However, Shell’s operating plan and outlook cannot reflect our 2050 net-zero emissions target, as this target is outside our planning period. Such future operating plans and outlooks could include changes to our portfolio, efficiency improvements and the use of carbon capture and storage and carbon credits. In the future, as society moves towards net-zero emissions, we expect Shell’s operating plans and outlooks to reflect this movement. However, if society is not net zero in 2050, as of today, there would be significant risk that Shell may not meet this target.
The information provided above regarding Shell’s NCI and net zero emissions target are not intended, nor should they be construed as introducing, suggesting or making any claim, target or representation thereof other than what is included in the content.
Forward-Looking non-GAAP measures
This content may contain certain forward-looking non-GAAP measures such as free cash flow and underlying operating expenses. We are unable to provide a reconciliation of these forward-looking non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures because certain information needed to reconcile those non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures is dependent on future events some of which are outside the control of Shell, such as oil and gas prices, interest rates and exchange rates. Moreover, estimating such GAAP measures with the required precision necessary to provide a meaningful reconciliation is extremely difficult and could not be accomplished without unreasonable effort. Non-GAAP measures in respect of future periods which cannot be reconciled to the most comparable GAAP financial measure are calculated in a manner which is consistent with the accounting policies applied in Shell plc’s consolidated financial statements. These forward-looking non-GAAP measures are provided to assist readers in understanding management’s use and expectations of such measures and may not be appropriate for other purposes.
The contents of websites referred to in this content do not form part of this content.
We may have used certain terms, such as resources, in this content that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) strictly prohibits us from including in our filings with the SEC. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 20-F, File No 1-32575, available on the SEC website www.sec.gov.
